|
Written by Bright Future Staff
|
|
Monday, Jun 30, 2008 |
|
Problem: In communities where valuable resources are
located conflicts frequently arise between those who stand to gain
financially from the harvesting of those resources and
environmentalists legitimately concerned about the sustainability of
the ecosystem. One good example of this is in Canada where large
tracts of valuable timber are located in environmentally sensitive
areas.
Solution: In Canada a complex and somewhat uncontrolled
process resulted in a partnership being formed between logging
companies and environmentalists. A key to the success of this
process was that both opposing parties had nearly equal amounts of
power to force their agenda. The process involved an escalation of the
conflict until it was clear that one or both parties would lose if
conflict escalated further. A third party with the power to award
victory to either side arose and brought the opposing parties together
to find common ground. The opposing parties were then forced to
find a “win win” solution. The emerging agreement allowed the
logging companies to still harvest timber, albeit in a sustainable
manner, and the environmentalists committed to assist with the
marketing of those products. The resulting partnership also
involved support of retailers who sell the final
product. The reader may also note that these
partnerships were achieved without the involvement of governmental
agencies. |
| Make a comment on this article |
|
Last Updated ( Friday, Jul 18, 2008 )
|
|
Read more...
|